klasmalmstrom
Forum Guru
Probably not - I am thinking of the tanks based on the M4.How about the M45?
Last edited:
Probably not - I am thinking of the tanks based on the M4.How about the M45?
So Bugles are declared at the start of the MPh (W7.8).Bugles are declared at the start of the MPh (W7.8).
Before actual movement (W7.82) "...wishing to move to a new hex in that MPh, the CPVA player makes a DR.." Indicates that the move has not YET been made. So the Jitter DR is made, results if any applied, then the CPVA moves the unit/s declared just prior to be about to move.
Only in so much as firing across a cliff hexside affects Continuous Slope.Question on Steep Hills: does their existence negate continuous slope? Playing AP190 We are Sparta and the question came up. Level three hills only are steep slope. Apologies if this has been asked elsewhere.
Thanks, so my read was that because it crosses adjacent across a cliff from 3 down to 2, then there is no continuous slope. Confirming what I thought!Only in so much as firing across a cliff hexside affects Continuous Slope.
W1.32 FIRING RESTRICTIONS: All fire to/from a Steep Hills hex to/from an adjacent hex is treated as if occurring across a cliff hexside (B11.31-.32) if the target is at a different elevation than the firer [EXC: if either firer/target is in an upper-level-(B23.421)/rooftop-(B23.8) Location; if firing across a road hexside; by/vs Aerial units].
Recent Q&A on that subject: http://www.gamesquad.com/forums/index.php?threads/cliffs-and-continuous-slope.167424/
Yes, if there are "no Good Order American MMC at ≥ Level 1 on board 17" - the other part of the VC.Scenario 209, can the North Koreans win if American Vehicles remain in play?
"and/or" - that's the "standard" ASL-speak to say "inclusive or" - i.e, you win if you fulfill either one of the requirements, but you also win if you fulfill both of them.It's confusing. To me, it reads that they have to clear the hill AND no AFV remain in play, OR they win if no AFV remain in play (regardless of MMCs on the hill).
"if there is no Good Order MMC at >= Level 1...and/or if no American AFV remain in play."
No errata that I am aware of. I'll see if I can dig up the submitted version and see if anything got lost in translation....ASL 206....
Should the 236's in I and M companies for the Americans be CREWS for the RCL???
Errata for this?
What would be the point of even mentioning clearing the hill then?It's confusing. To me, it reads that they have to clear the hill AND no AFV remain in play, OR they win if no AFV remain in play (regardless of MMCs on the hill).
"if there is no Good Order MMC at >= Level 1...and/or if no American AFV remain in play."
What would be the point of even mentioning clearing the hill then?
No they are not PTO.Are Korean scenarios considered PTO? If so, where is this written?
Thanks,
Steve
W.2A defines them as UN forcesAre ROK units considered part of UN forces for the purposes of W.5? (I don't have Nat. Capability charts for FW)
Thx.
Thanks. I was so focused on searching WP that I didn't think to look a few inches up the page. Doh!W.2A defines them as UN forces