Re: New questions
1. Is JD a hard hindrance (adding +2 to Firelanes) or is a a soft hindrance (adding 0 to FLs)?
Based on A9.222 it is a hard hindrance since it isn't listed as a soft hindrance, but based on what we feel is the correct feeling based on the +2 hindrance, but only +1 TEM the hindrance is more concealment and less cover and therefore it should be soft.
"Hard" hindrance based on A9.222 as mentioned above. The "logical" answer (more concealment, than cover) was pretty much a 50-50 split, but at best JD was still equivalent to scattered light jungle in some respects, therefore "hard" hindrance.
2. B30.7 says that pillboxes occupants are known once an occupant makes an attack. Does this attack have to have occurred during the current CG date, or does an attack during a previous date mean the occupants are still known? (For an "official" answer this may have to go to MMP, but what did you play?)
They begin the new date/scenario "fresh". I.E. they can be HIP/Concealed until they make an attack for each scenario as per B30.7.
3. This may be pushing the rules a lot, but I don't see the problem as it is written now ( but not allowing THH in cellars would work.) G1.422 allows HIP THH in any concealment terrain. A26.11 & A26.132 says that the HIP THH will prevent the Marines from gaining control of the pilbox/location. What is to prevent the Japanese from setting up HIP THH in pillbox cellars and using them to keep control of the pillbox (at least until Marines move into the cellar, or the AFV's show up and the THH are needed elsewhere)?[/QUOTE]
I see no problem with that a long as it fits with existing ASLRB rules. during PT, there was much HIP'ing of Japanese units causing the USMC to enter/search PBs. I don't remember an instance of using HIP THH for that purpose but I see no reason to prevent it.