Aries
03 Dec 06, 11:00
Just wondering, how many are actually interested ONLY in console machines for their potential PC game applications (like me).
As it stands, I have no preference for 360 over PS3 over Wii and they are all equally capable of losing me where the actual games are concerned.
When I heard a PS3 might be able to play Steel Panthers though suddenly I was interested.
I've been waiting for console technology to catch up and join the technology that we call PC gaming. Because, all a PC game is, is a game built for the many myriad permutations of PCs.
And the bajillion patches seem mostly to be about fixing all the glitches that seemingly endless variables create. Maybe if games made for PCs had more consistent platforms to be built for, PC games might enjoy less need for patching.
As it stands, I have no preference for 360 over PS3 over Wii and they are all equally capable of losing me where the actual games are concerned.
When I heard a PS3 might be able to play Steel Panthers though suddenly I was interested.
I've been waiting for console technology to catch up and join the technology that we call PC gaming. Because, all a PC game is, is a game built for the many myriad permutations of PCs.
And the bajillion patches seem mostly to be about fixing all the glitches that seemingly endless variables create. Maybe if games made for PCs had more consistent platforms to be built for, PC games might enjoy less need for patching.