PDA

View Full Version : OT -- Commissioning USS Texas


Bullethead
09 Sep 06, 17:33
Off the RJW topic but I figure this would be of interest to most readers of this board....

An old friend of mine used to serve aboard boomers in the USN. One of his old shipmates, who stayed in, is now the chief engineer aboard the USN's latest and greatest attack sub, USS Texas (SSN-775). This ship is so new, in fact, that it was only commissioned this morning in Galveston, Texas. Anyway, my friend's friend invited us all to the show, so naturally I jumped at the chance.

Being a guest of a crewman, I got to go inside the thing yesterday. Of course, they wouldn't let me take pictures inside, but I can describe some of it. For instance, this sub's torpedo room is all modular: they can put racks for different types of weapons in there, or the space for bunking extra personnel, such as divers and SEALs. This is a new design feature. Another new feature is that this sub doesn't have the classic periscopes penetrating the pressure hull and going into the control room. Instead, all the imagery is wired in and displayed on a bigscreen TV so everybody in the control room can see it. That sounds like such a useful feature I'm surprised it's never been done before.

The outside of the ship looks like this (after the crew had jogged aboard when ordered to man the ship):

http://people.delphiforums.com/jtweller/Texas02.JPG

As this was happening, 2 F/A-18s blasted by and we also had a flyover by a formation consisting of an SBD, and F4U, and an F6F from the local air museum.

Security was quite impressive and something of an ordeal. This wasn't just because of the uber-secret sub itself, but because of the amazing collection of brass and VIPs who turned out for the show. Everybody in the crowd of about 6-7000 had to go through metal detectors, have their cars searched, etc., and there were guards all around on the pier, in boats in the harbor, and in the air above. I was quite impressed, however, with the efficiency, speed, and courtesy of the personnel handling the crowd screening.

Here's why the security:

http://people.delphiforums.com/jtweller/Texas01.JPG

On this podium, we had the 1st Lady (sponsor of the ship), both US Senators from Texas, the Assistant Secretary of the USN, the CNO, the admiral in charge of all subs, assorted admirals with less than 4 stars (each with a staff of captains and commanders to carry his briefcase), the governor of Texas, the mayor of Galveston, and the CEOs of both the GD Electric Boat and Northrop-Grumman Newport News shipyards. And in the front few rows of seats there were a dozen or so US Congressmen and a bunch of Texas legislators.

Given all this AND the sub itself, the fact that it only took a couple hours to run the whole crowd through the screening process AND have ushers take them to their seats was just amazing. The airport screeners need to take lessons from the USN :).

Blackcloud6
09 Sep 06, 20:26
Great post. Thanks!

Zakalwe
09 Sep 06, 20:55
Cool!

btw. My hometown is the base of all German subs, including the first two Hydrogen-cell powered ones. My brother was a "U-Boot Fahrer" too, but on one of the old Diesel-Electric boats (U-23).

I myself am an old Silent Service, AOD and SH3 veteran.

;)

Z.

FastPhil
09 Sep 06, 23:05
thanks for the Pictures:

I tried to zoom in to see if I knew anyone but alas the zoom was blury. The 774s are nice boats. the Virginia is stationed here along with other subs. I live near the Groton Sub Base and am a retired bubblehead.:)

Bullethead
11 Sep 06, 10:48
I tried to zoom in to see if I knew anyone but alas the zoom was blury.

The program they handed out at the affair has a picture of every man jack in the commissioning crew. Let me know the names, ranks, and rates of people you're interested in and I'll see if I can find them.

Commodore Rob
14 Sep 06, 09:36
Interesting, I recall watching a documentry a few weeks ago on one her sister subs, and they were talking about the fact that everyone worked from the control room and had access to the periscope images.

Out of curiosity is it usual for the US navy to reuse names of older vessals still afloat? I know that the Royal Navy wont reuse the name of a ship if a ship with that name still exists, they will even rename the previous ship so they can use a name again. I believe its all down to superstition:)

Bullethead
14 Sep 06, 14:34
Out of curiosity is it usual for the US navy to reuse names of older vessals still afloat? I know that the Royal Navy wont reuse the name of a ship if a ship with that name still exists, they will even rename the previous ship so they can use a name again. I believe its all down to superstition:)

I'm not sure. Names don't get re-used that often these days, or they wouldn't if they didn't keep changing the rules about which type of ship gets what type of name ;).

In the case of the name "Texas" specifically, I don't know the status of the previous (3rd) USS Texas, which was a CGN. She was decommissioned 13 years ago, but whether she's in mothballs or was scrapped is beyond my ken. But I figure she had to have been scrapped or the name wouldn't be available.

When the CGN was built in the 70s, the 2nd USS Texas was still afloat (and still is today). However, she'd been sold off the USN's list to the state of Texas in 1946 so the USN didn't have any ship of that name. But when the 2nd Texas was laid down in about 1911, the USN still had the 1st Texas (a veteran of Santiago), so they renamed that one San Marcos.

caseyjay
14 Sep 06, 14:54
I know that the Royal Navy wont reuse the name of a ship if a ship with that name still exists, they will even rename the previous ship so they can use a name again. I believe its all down to superstition:)

Nah! its not due to superstition Rob:halo: its just not a good idea to have more than one ship with the same name ... at the least it would be confusing especially since the tradition arose during the age of sail, when despatches took days, weeks or even months to arrive .....
..."Captain! I ordered you to take command of HMS Wotsit and lead the Port Squadron against the French!!"
..."But Admiral, when I arrived at Portsmouth I found that it was a Harbour Hulk used as a brothel!!"
.."No no! I said go to Plymouth, the HMS Wotsit there is a new Ship of the line.."
".....D'oh" :laugh:

Ironhand
14 Sep 06, 19:41
I think if the name is not on a commissioned vessel, it can be used by the USN. There has never been another USS Arizona or USS Constitution for example. I'm not sure though.

Blackcloud6
17 Sep 06, 17:57
There has never been another USS Arizona or USS Constitution for example.

I beleive that is because neither ship has been stricken from the Navy rolls. The USS Constitution is still a commissioned ship in the US Navy. I think the USS Arizona still is but am not sure of her status,

Ironhand
17 Sep 06, 21:08
Both are still commissioned.

Bullethead
18 Sep 06, 19:42
You know, there WAS a 2nd Constitution, for a little while. She was one of the Lexington-class battlecruisers that was cancelled under the Washington Treaty. She was laid down in 1920 but never progressed far and was never launched.

Ironhand
18 Sep 06, 23:26
OOps:) Forgot all about that one. Eh, it probably would of had its name changed:)