Get your red-hot scenarios...

[JAMiAM]

...Stauffenberg's Scenario Depot is back in business, at its new home.
http://www.historical-gaming.com/scenarios/dan.html

[Siberian HEAT]

"Excellent"

[Menschenfresser]

I second that "Eexxxcellent..."

And I see it contains DNO 3.6...

Anyone have a change file on that bad boy?

[viridomaros]

excellent too the picture you added to your smg siberian heat
really great

[Chuck?]

Any word on the status of the WWI scenario?

[JAMiAM]

Originally posted by Menschenfresser
And I see it contains DNO 3.6...

Anyone have a change file on that bad boy?

Should be listed on the doc file. Primary change was the adjustment of Soviet Replacements, from 4000 Rifle squads per turn to 2500 Rifle Squads, and 1500 Light Rifle Squads per turn, along with many of the newly leveed Soviet Divisions receiving Light Rifle Squads, instead of Rifle Squads.

[Menschenfresser]

Changes in ver. 3.6:
--Numerous Soviet OB & TOE refinements by Pavel Voylov.
--Russian abbreviations used for Soviet units. List added towards end of notes.
--Opening Soviet shock on turn 1-2 @ 80%
--German Campaign season shock following opening boosts levels off @ 105%, with periodic drops on “Supply Disorganisation turns”.
--Soviet regular rifle squad replacement rate dropped significantly with excess put into light rifle squads.
--Soviet conscript and militia divisions formed in summer of ’41 now entirely composed of light infantry (limited to the division series 242 to 300 roughly). Many of these divisions also appear well below establishment strength.

Do'h!
I asked because I seem to remember 3.5 didn't list version changes.

Damn! I have two games going now. Soon as those are done...sometime in 2005...I'll have to try out the newer, weaker Soviets.

[Fading Captain]

Glad to see that the WWI scenario is in "playtesting." :thumup:

This one has intrigued me for a awhile.

[Mantis]

Originally posted by Tim McBride
Enjoy.....

Glad to see the site finally going public, Tim! Good stuff! Main page typo "site is currently ran (run) by Tim McBride". You might also want to tastefully allude to the fact that you aren't brothers, as it comes off heavily that way.

[Mantis]

http://www.historical-gaming.com/unit.html

Campaign's should be Campaigns

[Mantis]

Same with OOB's becoming OOBs

[Mantis]

http://www.historical-gaming.com/toe.html

'Listed int he' - Listed in the

'around the worl' - around the world

[Mantis]

Out of the sake of curiousity (no negativity intended), I recall Daniel being one of the most vocal participators when it came down to the potentials of 'ranking' scenarios, and scenario submissions. He had some good points, and I would like to reiterate some of them.

Listed below are links to pages of scenarios by several designers. The Pen and The Sword tries to find only the very best for you. Any submisions should be sent to the Scenario Review Team, we will be more then happy to look over any scenario sent in.

May I enquire as to what standards are imposed; who makes up the Scenario Review Team; if we don't know these people, what qualifications do they have; by what margin must a scenario be 'approved' by dissenting reviewers, and what criteria are considered?

[Mantis]

If you guys manage do do justice to this section, and meet Daniel's admittedly high standards, I believe you'll have a gold mine in this portion of your site.

[Mantis]

Glad to see you guys finally have a home! Looking forward to visiting once the polish is on!

No problem about the text 'placeholders'. Scenario rating is a very contentious issue, and I was just trying to pick your brains!

[JAMiAM]

Originally posted by Mantis
Glad to see you guys finally have a home! Looking forward to visiting once the polish is on!

I'll visit once the Linguisa is on...or a good Hot Link. Polish is kind of bland for my tastes. Definitely call, if you pop a keg, though. Haven't tied one on for a while now...;)

[Mantis]

Sorry, just realized that when Tim asked us to point out anything odd, I should have gone over it all and just made one post with spelling corrections. I wasn't trying to be critical; just pointing out a few typos and trying and help out!

Best of luck with the site, guys!