Check out our friends and Affiliates
Home    News    Features    Op-Eds    Reviews    Videos    Downloads    Games A-Z    |    Groups    Blogs    Forums    Chat Rooms    |    Staff    Contact Us    Help
Join the discussion today!

Feed aggregator

Need Some Insight on a Game

Forums: Latest Threads - Sun, 09/28/2014 - 21:07
Civilization IV. I saw it on sale for under $10 at a local used bookstore earlier last week and nearly bought it (I nabbed a comic book instead lol). But, I have been craving a good 4x strategy game that covers our world's history or at least a time period from it. Civilization has always seemed very attractive to me in that regard. However, seeing as Civ V does not work on my comp I have thus, been contemplating getting Civ IV instead (assuming it works lol). So, does anyone have anything to say about this game? And of the Civ games, I.E. Civ III-V because Civ III is as far back as I'm willing to go graphics-wise, which do you think is the best?

P.S. I cannot decided between Civ IV or a compendium edition of the Age of Empire series (I & II + expansions).
Categories: Forums

What Game and or Series Would You Like to See Reinvented?

Forums: Latest Threads - Fri, 09/26/2014 - 06:27
A lil something we can all have fun with :cool:

Nintendo likes to reinvent their main series, Mario and Zelda. Each time they use new art styles, character designs (sort of), have new puzzles and quests and twists to the storylines, and etc. What series outside of those two, would you like to see be reinvented and how do you envision this reinvention? Be creative! Use pictures, youtube videos, and whatever else you can think of!

My game:

If I had to reinvent a game/series, it would be... S.T.A.L.K.E.R. I would set it around anytime when there were large empires connecting Asia to Europe and North Africa. I like the idea of radiation pockets existing (not sure how plausible this is in reality) underneath the Earth's surface in the latest Godzilla movie and use that to create numerous zones throughout those empires... for future installments obviously.

Possible eras to toy around in: The Roman Empire at its zenith in Gaul or even northern Italy. The Medieval Ages during the Crusades and East Asia under the Mongol Empire are some ideas. One can easily see the various competing factions in the game and with game engines today, it would be a larger, more persistent world. You can ride horses and it would be a barter system as coinage would be totally worthless in the "plague areas."

So now you can imagine what kind of shenanigans that could happen. The combat system would more closely resemble Chivalry or Mount & Blade on hardcore modes while the easier modes would be . The music would be by the composer(s) for Star Wars: The Old Republic's orchestral scores. The graphics of course, would be like S.T.A.L.K.E.R.'s, keeping that gritty realism. I would also add in a limited multiplayer element that allows you and several of your friends (maybe 5 of you) to play together and it would be a continuous world. That means if you're off and 2 of your friends are on and add more to a stash, it'll be there when you get on and check it later after they get off.
Categories: Forums

A New World

Latest Blogs - Thu, 09/25/2014 - 11:06
Crossposted from my blog at

An approximate pattern for 4X games in general is to start out with a single base/settlement, move out, find valuable terrain and claim it with further bases, solidify borders to keep others away from the valuable bits you've found, and then go take their stuff.

Thus, these games generally start out as ones of colonization. Whether it's sending ships out into the galaxy, or settling the barbarian-infested wilderness, it's much the same. Colonizing the New World is a natural fit for the common strategy game desire of building up. But, other than a fad in the late-'80s to mid-'90s it has not been a popular subject. More interesting, they're a fairly disparate bunch.

Gold of the Americas (1989) from SSG is a favorite of mine, in part because it is so small. It covers three centuries at a rate of a decade per turn, and is playable in an afternoon. You play as the king's viceroy in the New World, in charge of colonizing and developing the new world so as to fill the King's coffers back in Europe. Europe itself only imposes itself in the game in the form of support from the King (if you paid your taxes...) and deciding who is at war or allied among the four powers. Slaves can be imported and exploited along with the native Indians, and at low development, colonies can die out.

Sid Meier's Colonization (1994) is a spin-off of Civilization, and it shows. However, it does a lot of things differently that give it a good colonial feel. Population, and units on the map are interchangeable, and can be shifted from city to city; in contrast, there is not a lot of population growth in the game; population generally comes from Europe. Population exists in several forms, from convicts and indentured servants (who are not as productive as normal 'free' population) to more productive specialists. Slavery does not show up, nor the dying off of the natives from disease, though they may 'convert' and come live in your settlements. Trade is important, with a need to send cargo back to Europe to sell to buy tools and weapons (until you can produce them yourself). And finally, the game is completely goal oriented: instead of just trying to build the best colonies you can in the time provided, you must declare independence and win the resulting Revolutionary War to beat the game.

Conquest of the New World (1996) is close in structure to Colonization, but with a lot of attention on the world environment. The terrain is done in a simple 3D style, with elevations shown. Exploration is explicitly rewarded with points awarded for the first player to explore the length of a river or a prominent mountaintop (and the ability to name the feature). Combat is more involved, using a simple mini-game that is well done. The influence of Europe is minimal, with further colonies having to be be built as settlers from existing one. Not only is independence not necessary for winning the game (but it does add to the victory point total), but you can play as the natives and attempt to 'federate' the other tribes and establish a powerful native nation to resist the colonials.

[Imperialism II (1999) isn't really a colonization game, but that is part of what it shows. The New World is important because it has materials that are needed to make your nation more productive, but victory is determined purely by the Old World. The Europa Universalis series (2000-2013) is also in this period, and features similar concerns though it is more oriented to colonizing the region rather than specific worries for particular trade goods.

All of these games feature exploration, but only Conquest tries to make it a goal sufficient unto itself (though Colonization also has 'goodie huts', of rewards scattered through through the world). Exploration is probably the most abused system in gaming. You either know what's there or not. On the scale of any of these games, exploration is not a binary proposition. Sure, there's hills over there, and mountains further off, but what's the place really like? How fertile? How many villages in the area? I'd love to see a system where you slowly progress from very general knowledge to more detailed, as you move from small expeditions moving through the area, to regular trade, to settlement.

One of the nice points of Colonization is the treatment of the natives. They are split up into a number of generalized tribes, that differ in how powerful they are (and how much loot they have), and will each have their own relations with different European powers. They can trade, and train people into specialists, and slowly get alarmed as European presence continues. They can gain horses and guns and become more dangerous. Only Imperialism II and Europa Universalis come close to this, but without as much interest. Conquest allows you to play as the 'high natives', but the representation of the various Indian tribes is shallow.

Overall, I am surprised that we haven't seen more games on the subject. I'm pretty sure Conquest was inspired by Colonization, but the chain stopped there. There is a new version of Colonization (on the Civ IV engine), but it is a very faithful re-release of the original, and not really a new game. Perhaps these games (and GotA and Colonization in particular) said most of what needed to be said, but I think there's room for a very interesting exploration-based game, if someone wants to tackle the challenges of partial knowledge.
Categories: Blogs

Reviewed: Hellsing Ultimate

Latest Blogs - Sun, 09/21/2014 - 01:41

Ready for some Halloween entertainment?

Hellsing Ultimate is now the third title to officially make it to my august list of anime suitable for viewing by adults. I really wasn't expecting it to make the list at all as, again, I am not a fan of anime, nor of horror, and especially not of vampire stories. Personally, I find the whole vampire craze to be as banal as the more recent zombie craze. Blood suckers don't terrify me in the same way meeting a werewolf would (this probably has something to do with being exposed to vampire schlock like Twilight for too many years). But Hellsing Ultimate is commendably different. In the same fashion that Guillermo del Toro is seeking to rehabilitate the vampire with his solid television series The Strain, Hellsing Ultimate is going back to vampires that don't sip as much as crunch (sorry about the large images! I am just too lazy to resize them for here :)):

Yeah, they are pretty nasty. Even the official webpage emphasizes this fact:

Remember when vampires had fangs? Remember when they were known as terrifying monsters that stalked the night, instead of moody teenagers that sparkle in daylight? It’s time to drive a stake through the lovesick heart of contemporary vampire nonsense. Satisfy your bloodlust with Hellsing Ultimate, the definitive action-horror anime. That is truth in advertising right there!

But here is the kicker: while this is what initially caused me to give Hellsing Ultimate a viewing, that is not what ultimately hooked me into the series. In an unexpected twist reminiscent of Girls und Panzer, Hellsing Ultimate ultimately snared me with its wonderful characters. Okay, they weren't necessarily "wonderful"in the lighthearted way of GuP's Ukari Akiyama or Mako Reizei, but more in the captivating way of a homicidal maniac. Take, for example, Sir Integra Fairbrook Wingates Hellsing, the freaky chick who can be seen here:

I wasn't at all thrilled with the character when she was first introduced because of how we initially meet her: as a young, frightened girl being hunted by her uncle. As I watched her cower, all teary-eyed, from her father's insane brother - he sought to steal the lucrative family business of monster hunting away from her - I figured I knew how this was going to play out: that she would survive, of course, but be more forgiving for the experience. That she would bring a new compassion and feminine sensibility to the rough and tumble world of monster hunting.


Much to my pleasure, Sir Integra Hellsing is actually revealed to have become a stone-cold killer because of that experience. She had morphed into a monster hunter of such singular purpose and dedication that her feminine side had actually become muted, hence the reason why she is referred to as SIR Hellsing rather than Lady Hellsing. And I, like her devoted employees, came to love her all the more for it. Nice trick!

And then there is police officer Seras Victoria (I love the names in this show!):

She inadvertently becomes the newest member of the Hellsing organization when a plague of vampires wipes out her police department. She does survive the attack but only as a newly minted, if reluctant, vampire. Her journey is a tragically fascinating one as the viewer gets to see her slowly morph from an innocent, country bumpkin police gal into a raging tool of vampiric vengeance.

And then we have this guy:

That would be Hellsing's secret weapon, her personal pit bull, the vampire king A La, I mean Alucard (an obvious palindrome). To be honest, he turned out to be my least favorite character of the show because of his tendency to burst into completely inappropriate bouts of manical laughter, not to mention that fact that he is really, really OP. Regardless, I ultimately came to applaud the show for his presence because he represented a return to the hateful, spiteful, revolting vampires of old. Alucard is very reminiscent of Hannibal Lecter; a monster who relishes manipulation and killing (and feasting on his victims, of course) as a way of affirming his superiority. And he is very good at it.

Then there is perhaps the best anime character I have ever come across:

Meet Father Alexander Anderson, the "Bayonet Priest," the genetically engineered slayer of vampires and other evil, and the foremost soldier of the secretive Vatican Section XIII, the Iscariot Organization. If Alucard is a bat out of hell, Anderson is the man holding the net to catch him. Indeed, whenever these two men are in the same scene together, it is...divine. Remember that age old question about what happens when an immovable object meets an irresistible force? Same thing going on here, and the resultant sparks and explosions are wonderful to watch. Besides being a great antagonist to Alucard, Father Alexander is just a wonderful character because of his zealotry. You just have to love a man who is inclined to say such things as "violence is never the right answer...unless used against heathens and monsters." LOL! Lord, how the world could use a man like him right about now!

These characters, and many more that populate the world of Hellsing Ultimate, really serve to elevate the show to a much higher level of engagement than one might initially expect from a show about vampire hunters. I was expecting something closer to a Scooby Doo mystery, but ultimately found a drama closer to a gritty Dick Wolf crime drama.

Of course, having great characters without a great plot would be a waste. No worries here, though! The ultimate plot for Hellsing Ultimate is one heck of a wild ride. Not knowing anything about this series prior to watching it, I figured it was going to be about Sir Hellsing and her exploits battling the creatures of the night. While the first episode does begin with such a simple premise, the show quickly spirals into wild territory that involves a new world war were a Nazi - yes, Nazi! - vampire army returns to conquer the world (albeit, the action is entirely focused on England). Of course, Hellsing's organization of "Protestant Knights" soon finds itself on the front lines of this renewed invasion. But before Hellsing and company can come to grips with this new situation, things quickly become even wilder when a rogue Vatican archbishop by the name Enrico Maxwell takes advantage of the chaos and launches his own Catholic "Reconquista" of England! Good times!

Vampire Nazis on the attack!
What results are some truly excellent carnage-filled scenes of battle that stretch from a carrier at sea, to the streets of London, and even to the halls of Hellsing's HQ itself. The battle for Hellsing's manor is particularly engrossing because it requires the shrinking violet Seras Victoria to step up and lead a die-hard band of French mercenaries, known as the Wild Geese (great movie, btw!), in vicious, last man standing combat. What results is something reminiscent of Stalingrad...but with, you know, vampires. And French soldiers. And magic. Moving on....

The Wild Geese before all heck breaks loose

Now, there are "vampires" and there are "VAMPIRES!" in Hellsing Ultimate. Rank and file vampires are rather unremarkable, but boss vampires are formidable creatures with unique powers. This is what makes them so terrifying. Alucard, for example, has powers that can best be described as demonic, something that makes him particularly vicious when provoked.

Alucard's ability to summon the hounds of hell
But other vampires have other "gifts." For example, the Nazi vampire Zorin Blitz is a master of illusion:

In Hellsing Ultimate, even non-vampires can have special, magical powers. Walter, for example, Hellsing's "butler" and former master vampire hunter, can summon lethal magical strings that cut opponents to pieces:

Now, you would probably think that having the ability to call up magical weaponry would probably be enough when fighting the creatures of the night, right? Nope. This isn't some lame fantasy tale where everyone is reduced to magic and swords! We're in the modern world here, and that means modern weaponry! Oh yes! Bring it on!

Check out Alucard's preferred sidearm, something that probably would qualify as a "hand cannon":

Or Seras Victoria's preferred undead slaying weapon, a recoilless rifle:

"Bitches love cannons"
This show is a NRA fantasy come true! As with Larry Correia's fantastic Monster Hunter International, the weaponry in this anime is given detailed attention, something that makes it all the more awesome when the viewer gets to see it used in battle. I also liked how the equipment often comes with Christian battle cry embellishments:

Cool, cool stuff.

Needless to say, when you have central characters wielding magic and sporting some awesome weaponry, the resulting fights can be downright epic. Really, the characters in Hellsing Ultimate have more in common with the superheroes of The Avengers than they do with your typical cast of mortal vampire slayers. When these guys engage in battle, it is like watching the gods of Olympus slugging it out. Again, the coolness factor goes way up in these moments.

[BTW: I am sorry to keep using that word, "cool," but it really does best describe Hellsing Ultimate. In many ways, this anime is to the vampire genre what The Matrix was to cyberpunk. It is just a really cool re-imagining of a stale genre.]

What else is there to praise about Hellsing Ultimate? I have to say that the artwork is darn good. I understand that Hellsing Ultimate is based upon a multi-part graphic novel, and it shows in a good way. This anime definitely tries to preserve that manga style, leading to some memorable scenes that really are quite stylish at times.

Lastly, the music often hits the right note (pun) at the right time. Maybe not Cowboy Bebop good, but good nonetheless.

So, What's not to Like?

First off, this is no Girls und Panzer. Unlike that charming bit of anime that is quite safe for youngsters, Hellsing Ultimate comes with a well-earned Mature rating. There is a lot of swearing, tons of gore, and almost non-stop violence. So be warned.

Secondly, this is one of those anime series where the original Japanese soundtrack is inferior to the dubbed English version. Hellsing Ultimate is a story with an international cast of characters that spans Brits, French, Italians, Germans, and Irish personalities. With that in mind, I was somewhat surprised to hear that the original Japanese cast didn't attempt to try to sound like the respective nationality of their particular character; everybody just sounded Japanese. With the English dubbing that noticeable problem isn't an issue. While the English cast did resort to cliched accents, it nonetheless made for a marked improvement to the acting and, hence, the immersion.

Lastly, this show suffers from that annoying anime tendency to resort to farcical humor at the most inopportune moments. Nothing ruins a tense moment as having something like this suddenly pop up in the anime:

I am sorry you needed to see this

It is almost as if the professional animator left the studio only to have a 13 year old boy sneak in and vandalize the show with his own scribblings and bizarre sense of humor! Yes, I understand that there is probably some sort of cultural thing going on here but that doesn't make it any easier to take! This is a particularly bad tragedy for this anime because most of this goofball stuff centers on Seras. As I wrote above, she is an interesting character to watch because of the terrible predicament she finds herself in, but stuff like this just reduced the girl to an annoying clown. Not funny, not entertaining. More like unwanted graffiti, especially when the rest of the show is so dark. Can we get a "director's cut" where this unwanted slop is excised from the series?

Lastly, this anime is a ten part series. Sadly, the final two episodes will not be made available in the US of A until October of this year. Seeing where episode 8 ended, this amounts to torture!

Concluding Thoughts

As with Girls und Panzer, I never expected to get much beyond the first episode or two; I really just called this show up on a YouTube lark. The fact that I ultimately found myself watching episode after episode, enjoying each one more than the last, says just how much this show really shines as an example of a fresh take on a tired subject. When I wrote my GuP review, I remarked how the tank battles in that piece of anime was far superior to anything I had seen come out of Hollywood in a long time. I rhetorically asked how badly was Hollywood doing its job for that to happen? I say the same thing here, except that this is actually a MORE embarrassing situation because Hollywood is constantly pumping out vampire flicks. Just how poorly is Hollywood performing again if this bit of Japanese anime is providing something more original and more engrossing than any vampire flick I have seen emerge from their army of writers and multi-million dollar budgets in a long time? It is at times like this I wish I was a producer who could get on the phone and acquire an IP such as Hellsing Ultimate. In the right hands, this anime would absolutely shine as a movie. Sadly, with movies like Dracula Untold on the horizon, it looks like Hollywood is still stuck in the same, tired slump. Do yourself a favor: skip that movie and watch this instead. Here, I'll even get you started:


PS: How do I get my eyeglass lenses to shine like that?!? :D
Categories: Blogs

Building Economy

Latest Blogs - Tue, 09/16/2014 - 15:29
Crossposted from

I've been playing a fair amount of the old city-builder game Pharoah: Gold recently. (Bought it on sale at GoG at the beginning of the month.) And I've been pondering why.

I have played SimCity. I have a copy of SimCity 2000 (bought for cheap after 3000 came out). I have spent time with OpenTTD.

I think they're all fine enough. But they don't hold my attention for long. A few hours fiddling around with them and I'm done.

I am, in general, a strategy gamer. Which is a computer game genre definition so broad as to be close to useless. (The excellent strategy game podcast Three Moves Ahead has had occasional side discussions on 'what is a strategy game?', with Tom Chick asserting that 'everything is', and even making an interesting argument for The Sims as a strategy game.) There is, of course, a large number of sub-genres (ranging from overly-broad to tiny niche), and I've been meaning to talk about some of the smaller ones I've observed.

But, anyway: city-builders. SimCity is kind of the genre definer, and is generally a pure sandbox simulation 'game' without a lot of goals, and limited interaction with the actual mechanics. Pure sandbox games generally don't do much for me; that's the common thread between the games that don't hold my interest that I mentioned earlier.

Caesar was a popular city-builder game, that spawned three sequels, and two spinnoffs based on the the Caesar III engine (Pharoah and Zeus). I enjoyed the Caesar III demo way back when (somewhat to my surprise, and that demo is why I bought Pharoah: Gold). I've now played Pharoah: Gold obsessively for over a week, which is now tailing off (I think).

The difference is that while the Caesar/Pharoah-model city-builders look a bit like SimCity, there is a decided difference in execution. As mentioned, SimCity is pretty much pure sim. You zone areas, lay out roads, and mix in essential services, and wait to see if the sims can put together a viable economy. Pharaoh is actually an economic engine game (who knew I had that much eurogamer in me?). You are placing specific industries to produce raw materials which are then taken to other industries to turn them into usable goods which are needed for other purposes (building weapons, improving living conditions, etc). It can be seen as a close-up of the 'exploit' part of 4X (a genre I regularly enjoy).

This brings me to another game that I discovered and enjoyed years ago that could be mistaken for a city-builder: The Settlers II: Gold Edition. It is fairly close to Pharoah/Caesar, but is easier to see as not related to SimCity. Settlers is a pure economic engine game. Every building has a cost in lumber and stone to build. So you need to cut down trees, convert it to lumber and quarry stone to get anything done. The full set of resources needed to get everything done is much more complicated (but mostly turns into providing food to miners to generate iron and coal for creating weapons and armor, and gold to pay/upgrade the resulting soldiers), but does not involve any hidden mechanisms.

Pharoah on the other hand still has the 'sim' aspect of the residents having wants and desires that are not entirely surfaced to the player. A basic building needs to be provided with water, so the residents do better and upgrade it; then they need a bazaar to get food from, then religion.... But there is also 'desirability'. Placing a storage yard (for example) too close to a residential area makes it a less desirable location, and the building can only climb so far up the scale of increasing wealth. While there are ways to look at this in the game, no real guidance is given. How far does this effect spread? Which buildings are the worst for desirability? There's also an 'overall' mood which can keep new immigrants from arriving when you open up new areas, but I have no idea what contributes to that....

There is a final, very important thing that Pharoah and Settlers share that SimCity does not: They both have campaigns, which have missions. I'm not set loose to just make my own city. I have goals. In Settlers II this is to take control of the gate that leads to the next island/mission (or just wipe everyone else off the map in the alternate campaign; both campaigns are quite challenging). Pharoah starts with a 'build these buildings' format common to a lot of early/tutorial RTS campaigns, but is looking like it is shifting over to 'hit these arbitrary metrics in a challenging situation'. That makes sense, but I have a feeling I'm going abandon the campaign if it continues down that road.

There's also a framing story around the main campaigns in both. Settlers II is the story of a Roman expedition that got shifted to some pocket universe, and is trying to find it's way back through a succession of gates, hoping that one will lead home. Pharoah is about the successive generations of a family of administrators serving Egypt; the transition I mentioned happens at the beginning of the Old Kingdom stage. The former is far more effective at keeping me playing, but the latter is nicely used for a loose presentation of the history of Egypt.
Categories: Blogs

HPS Games

Latest Blogs - Tue, 09/09/2014 - 19:23
Originally Posted by Old Dog Good Day,

I have a number of HPS Simulations that I have listed on Amazon. Prices are either the lowest listed, or match the lowest listed.

Thanks for your consideration.
Old Dog

Squad Battles

Advance of the Reich

Tour of Duty

Early American Wars

War of 1812

Naval Battles


Modern Air Power

War Over the MidEast

Civil War Campaigns



Napoleonic Battles



Thanks again.
Categories: Blogs

HPS Games

Latest Blogs - Mon, 09/08/2014 - 12:13
Originally Posted by Old Dog Good Day,

I have a number of HPS Simulations that I have listed on Amazon. Prices are either the lowest listed, or match the lowest listed.

Thanks for your consideration.
Old Dog

Squad Battles

Advance of the Reich

Tour of Duty

Early American Wars

War of 1812

Naval Battles


Modern Air Power

War Over the MidEast

Civil War Campaigns



Napoleonic Battles



Tactical Studies Series

Point of Attack 2

Thanks again.
Categories: Blogs

The Fate of EVE Online

Latest Blogs - Wed, 09/03/2014 - 11:05
Word has it that CCP, creators of EVE Online, are closing their SF office and laying off numerous support staff. How that will affect EVE over the long term is uncertain, but it got me thinking about the state of the game and where it's headed. And, sadly, from where I sit it doesn't look good.

CCP wants a dark, dangerous, dystopian universe where actions have consequences and risk really means something. But the truth is that CCP has no idea how to create such a dynamic. What they've created instead is a chaotic stew of half-cooked ideas.

CCP and the EVE community rant and rave about the failures and childish gameplay of MMOs like World of Warcraft, and rightly so. But despite all the effort to make the gameplay more challenging and more consequence driven, EVE has devolved into as much of a pointless grind as WoW ever was. It just takes you a hell of a lot more time and effort to discover it's all been kind of pointless.

But it wasn't always that way. Back in the day, EVE had a ton of problems but it also had some very cool adaptive gameplay and a ton of potential. But slowly, inexorably, the most militant players systematically exploited every possible aspect of the game, forcing CCP to constantly make significant changes in order to try to maintain balance and stamp out the worst of the exploits. Sadly, the end result is a game that's so "fair" that there's hardly any point in even investing in your character. CCP has fallen victim to its own logic, and has helped foster a culture where the only thing that means anything is raw currency. Everything has been reduced to money, and since you can now easily buy as much game currency as you need with real world money, what's the point of playing at all?

You don't really get more powerful in EVE, and it's essentially impossible to really do anything meaningful beyond trolling your fellow players. So EVE, pretty as it is, is really nothing more than a giant sandbox to troll other people you don't know by blowing up stuff they don't really care about anyway.

EVE's purported goal was to be a persistent universe where actions had consequences, and one where those consequences mean everything. Instead, EVE has become an incredibly tedious, time consuming game where nothing means anything, really.

It's not all bad. There have been many small changes that add up to a significant quantity of overall improvement in the game. And you can still have some cool PvP action if you go and look for it. But EVE's problems are fundamental structural problems, and CCP won't ever change those things because the problems are simply beyond the skill level of the developers. The folks at CCP are wonderful game developers and they deserve credit for that. But though their technical prowess as developers is undeniable, their shortcomings as game designers is equally manifest.
Categories: Blogs

I just learned how to silence Fanboys:

Forums: Latest Threads - Tue, 09/02/2014 - 21:13
Facts! Yep, simple unadulterated, unbiased facts. Once again I called out the Fanboys and of course they immediately called me an 'asshat' and whatnot for stating that CIG (Star Citizen) doesn't follow it's own guidelines and bans people willy-nilly. So I simply challenged them to ask CIG why 'Joda' was banned without the requisite warning? And the response? Eerie silence. Nothing....not a single peep. The only response was simply more hostility from more Fanboys. Sad.

Categories: Forums

Panther Games to Change Publishers

Forums: Latest Threads - Tue, 09/02/2014 - 00:05
Panther Games will be changing publishers at the end of October 2014. It has signed an agreement with another publisher to publish both its computer and board games. We will announce the new publisher soon.

PG Logo Gold on Black.jpg

Panther will be leaving Matrix Games with a lot of good will. The Command Ops Public Forum at Matrix Games will remain available to customers after the transition and support through Matrix Games will continue until the end of October 2014. While not expected, should any future updates to the titles sold through Matrix be required, they would also be compatible with the Matrix Games releases.

Mr Dave O’Connor, President of Panther Games, said “We have been with Matrix Games for ten years and have enjoyed working with them. We are looking forward to streamlining our arrangements for publishing both our computer and board games. We wish Matrix Games all the best for the future.”

Canberra, Australia. 2 September 2014 Attached Images
Categories: Forums

Gaming Industry Under Siege??

Forums: Latest Threads - Sat, 08/30/2014 - 02:44
Over the past two days I have become aware of several large scandals exploding across parts of the gaming world. One is about gaming journalism and the other is about threats to a female gamer and her criticism of the portrayal of women in video games. Another issue that was brushed under the rug was a gamer being "swatted" on live stream whilst playing Counter-Strike. While I am still sifting through the debris it is important to point out that the gaming community appears to be actively drawing lines and firing on all cylinders at each other over various issues.

For example, Anita Sarkeesian is known for a series Feminist Frequency (FemFreq for short). She recently did a mini-series detailing the portrayal of women in video games. Almost immediately she came under extremely harsh backlash that even targeted her personally (death and rape threats as well as the release of her and her parent's addresses). She was forced to leave her home (apparently) under the advice of the FBI whom she contacted in relation to the threats. However, some have claimed that her videos steal content from other content creators without crediting them, spew out fallacies, misconstrue games, and outright lie about them. So the community is split. But, I wholly disagree with those who believe she is getting her just deserves for misinforming people about games. They just that, GAMES. To go so far as to sit back and let people threaten her and her family's lives is as disgusting as those making the threats and it just really reinforces the gamin community's issue with female gamers, characters, and the enormous amounts of misogyny that exist.

Here is Pt. 2 over her series:

The other is about terrible gaming journalism, specifically between Kotaku and Plygon. I honestly just discovered this minutes ago so I cannot really comment on it as much as I did above:

From Gamer Headlines:
Quote: A few days ago I posted an article that discussed in no small part the importance of standards within journalistic media. Gaming journalism is currently enduring a colossal change in tides that has seen several big names within the industry heavily criticised for acts of non-disclosure, censorship, as well the burial and with-holding of information. This string of events has been primarily publicised, fought for and evidenced by the gaming community itself, who have over-come all attempts to prevent the matter from spreading further.

Unfortunately, those attempts to quell the spread of information only served to infuriate and further encourage many gamers to continue calling out press regarding ethical negligence. Today, two more popular writers found themselves on the receiving end of strongly worded criticisms regarding the unreasonable overlap of personal relationships and publications.

Patricia Hernandez (@xpatriciah), writer at Kotaku, and Ben Kuchera (@BenKuchera), editor at Polygon, have been scalded this evening as Reddit users diverted to a highly detailed account of articles in which the two writers had failed to disclose personal interests prior to publishing their work. The accusation is especially scalding since it directly contradicts the recently stated ethical expectations of Kotaku editor-in-chief, Stephen Totilo (stephentotilo).

Read The Rest: Here So, what are everyone's thoughts on the subjects? I can already guess that many here agree that gamin journalism is the shits and I know that this is a hugely commonly understood fact from throughout the gaming community as evidenced across multiple forums I visit.

As for the issues with Sarkeesian, it is much trickier I feel. I have seen people criticize her content in other videos but agree that the backlash is totally unnecessary and just wrong. Others have stated that she deserves it which is enabling this form of disgusting cyber-based behaviour. I find it appalling that people are basically okaying those actions. Another thing is is that, as stated in the article from Gamer Headlines, the gaming industry has not major impact on world politics and economics, and etc. It is a purely entertainment industry first, and a possible educator second. However there are parts of it that undoubtedly require oversight. Both of these examples are important for the industry/hobby in moving forward. And to adequately tackle them every single tier of the industry MUST take part in open conversations about what to do and where to go. I feel that the industry is one of the few that can really shift and direct itself as a whole, along new paths. Yet, this requires its participants to understand and realize that mature, open, and honest debate is needed and childish trolling and threats are unfounded and should be accompanied by severe consequences.
Categories: Forums
Syndicate content